Vorlage:1963 Christliche Kunst und Architektur: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
* [1963-000] [Englisch] [[Frédéric Debuyst]]: Church Architecture and Christian Celebration , in: [[Liturgical Arts]], 32, 1963, S. 2-9 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ; | |||
** [1963-000] [Englisch] unter dem Titel: Contemporary Church Architecture, auch in: [[Arts & Architecture]], 80, 1963, S. 26 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=vC4NAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini | |||
** 1963, S. 3/1963, S. 27: „As early as 1930, the German pioneers of the liturgical movement, and in particular Romano Guardini and the architect Rudolf Schwarz prepared the way for our advances today with an analysis of the liturgical space which remains one of the keenest ever performed. Examples of church architecture resulting from their analysis lead us to believe that in each phase of the evolution the only good churches were those which disclosed a clear, simple, uncompromising expression of both the liturgical and the architectural movements of their time. No wonder that good churches in this genre were relatively few: good modern architecture is never common, and genuine liturgical planning is always very difficult.“ [S. 3: außerdem Abbildung mit Bildunterschrift: „Great hall in castle Rothenfels, Germany. The liturgical arrangement, by Rudolf Schwarz and Romano Guardini, groups three areas of seats around the provisional altar. 1928. Destroyed in World War II.“ | |||
* [1963-000] [Englisch] [[Maurice Lavanoux]]: Editor´s Diary: XLVII (New York, June 20, 1963 ...), in: [[Liturgical Arts]], 31, 1962/63, S. 121 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ | * [1963-000] [Englisch] [[Maurice Lavanoux]]: Editor´s Diary: XLVII (New York, June 20, 1963 ...), in: [[Liturgical Arts]], 31, 1962/63, S. 121 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ | ||
** S. 121: „I thought of the great step forward in these matters since the 1930s when most of us were concerned with questions of peripheral importance. We sought solutions from the outside in; today, thanks to the deepening influence of writers like Guardini, Jungman, Pius Parsch, Dom Beauduin, Dom Virgil Michel OSB, Gerald Ellard, s J, Dom Godfrey Diekmann, OSB, Father H. A. Reinhold, and many others; to the weeks of the Liturgical Conference (and can I add LITURGICAL ARTS?) we now realize that the planning of our new churches and the evolution of the arts at the service of the Church stem from the primacy of the liturgy.“ | ** S. 121: „I thought of the great step forward in these matters since the 1930s when most of us were concerned with questions of peripheral importance. We sought solutions from the outside in; today, thanks to the deepening influence of writers like Guardini, Jungman, Pius Parsch, Dom Beauduin, Dom Virgil Michel OSB, Gerald Ellard, s J, Dom Godfrey Diekmann, OSB, Father H. A. Reinhold, and many others; to the weeks of the Liturgical Conference (and can I add LITURGICAL ARTS?) we now realize that the planning of our new churches and the evolution of the arts at the service of the Church stem from the primacy of the liturgy.“ | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 14. Dezember 2025, 16:36 Uhr
- [1963-000] [Englisch] Frédéric Debuyst: Church Architecture and Christian Celebration , in: Liturgical Arts, 32, 1963, S. 2-9 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ;
- [1963-000] [Englisch] unter dem Titel: Contemporary Church Architecture, auch in: Arts & Architecture, 80, 1963, S. 26 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=vC4NAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini
- 1963, S. 3/1963, S. 27: „As early as 1930, the German pioneers of the liturgical movement, and in particular Romano Guardini and the architect Rudolf Schwarz prepared the way for our advances today with an analysis of the liturgical space which remains one of the keenest ever performed. Examples of church architecture resulting from their analysis lead us to believe that in each phase of the evolution the only good churches were those which disclosed a clear, simple, uncompromising expression of both the liturgical and the architectural movements of their time. No wonder that good churches in this genre were relatively few: good modern architecture is never common, and genuine liturgical planning is always very difficult.“ [S. 3: außerdem Abbildung mit Bildunterschrift: „Great hall in castle Rothenfels, Germany. The liturgical arrangement, by Rudolf Schwarz and Romano Guardini, groups three areas of seats around the provisional altar. 1928. Destroyed in World War II.“
- [1963-000] [Englisch] Maurice Lavanoux: Editor´s Diary: XLVII (New York, June 20, 1963 ...), in: Liturgical Arts, 31, 1962/63, S. 121 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ
- S. 121: „I thought of the great step forward in these matters since the 1930s when most of us were concerned with questions of peripheral importance. We sought solutions from the outside in; today, thanks to the deepening influence of writers like Guardini, Jungman, Pius Parsch, Dom Beauduin, Dom Virgil Michel OSB, Gerald Ellard, s J, Dom Godfrey Diekmann, OSB, Father H. A. Reinhold, and many others; to the weeks of the Liturgical Conference (and can I add LITURGICAL ARTS?) we now realize that the planning of our new churches and the evolution of the arts at the service of the Church stem from the primacy of the liturgy.“
- [1963-000] [Englisch] Maurice Lavanoux: Editor´s Diary: XLVII (Mexico City and Cuernavaca, September 13-17, 1963 ...), in: Liturgical Arts, 32, 1963/64, November, S. 29 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ
- S. 29: „All this reminded me of the years of my last fling as a draftsman, 1927-1931 – when I read Cardinal Shuster´s The Sacramentary; also the books by Dom Lambert Beauduin OSB and Father Romano Guardini. The majority of the churches then built were planned in such a way that few seemed aware of what has since been called "the primacy of the liturgy ".“
- [1963-000] [Englisch] Raymond F. Pavia: Modern Church Building Problems of Sacred Space, in: Liturgical Arts, 31, 1963, 3, S. 74-76 [neu aufgenommen] – [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=HM1TAAAAMAAJ
- S. 74: „Perhaps Romano Guardini´s little book Sacred Signs[3 ROMANO GUARDINI, Sacred Signs. Pio Decimo Press, Saint Louis, 1956.]] can serve as a means of resensitizing our apprehension of things so that we may respond to what the object evokes rather than being arrested by the „thingness“ of the object. MODERN times came about as a result of strenuous and revolutionary activity.“
- S. 75: „In the twenties Romano Guardini and Rudolf schwarz were part of a group that made a specific study of the Church´s liturgy and ist expression in building. The modern German churches testify the value of these studies.“
- [1963-000] Rudolf Schwarz: Denken und Bauen. Schriften und Bauwerke, 1963, zu Romano Guardini Literaturverzeichnis S. 112 und 115 [neu aufgenommen] - [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=-dpPAAAAMAAJ