Vorlage:1964 Rezensionen Ein Wort zur liturgischen Frage: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „* [1964-000] [Englisch] Rezension zu: Kirchgaessner, Unto the Altar, in: Encounter, 25, 1964, S. 390 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=8RBOAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: ** S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does…“) |
|||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
* [1964- | * [1964-039] [Englisch] Rezension zu: Kirchgaessner, Unto the Altar, in: [[Encounter]], 25, 1964, S. 390 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=8RBOAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: | ||
** S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does not possess; second, Activism, which insits upon practical ends; the third, Dilettantism, making changes in worship with an inadequate historical, theological, philological and musical knowledge. The fourth, liturgical Conservatism, in which „traditional“ equals „good“ and „new“ equals „irreligious“. ...“ | ** S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does not possess; second, Activism, which insits upon practical ends; the third, Dilettantism, making changes in worship with an inadequate historical, theological, philological and musical knowledge. The fourth, liturgical Conservatism, in which „traditional“ equals „good“ and „new“ equals „irreligious“. ...“ | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 26. Januar 2026, 23:24 Uhr
- [1964-039] [Englisch] Rezension zu: Kirchgaessner, Unto the Altar, in: Encounter, 25, 1964, S. 390 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=8RBOAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini:
- S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does not possess; second, Activism, which insits upon practical ends; the third, Dilettantism, making changes in worship with an inadequate historical, theological, philological and musical knowledge. The fourth, liturgical Conservatism, in which „traditional“ equals „good“ and „new“ equals „irreligious“. ...“
