Vorlage:1964 Rezensionen Ein Wort zur liturgischen Frage
Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
Version vom 25. Juli 2025, 08:50 Uhr von Helmut Zenz (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „* [1964-000] [Englisch] Rezension zu: Kirchgaessner, Unto the Altar, in: Encounter, 25, 1964, S. 390 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=8RBOAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: ** S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does…“)
- [1964-000] [Englisch] Rezension zu: Kirchgaessner, Unto the Altar, in: Encounter, 25, 1964, S. 390 ff. [neu aufgenommen] – [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=8RBOAQAAIAAJ; zu Romano Guardini:
- S. 392: „The Kirchgaessner symposium, Unto the Altar, begins with an essay by Romano Guardini on “Some Dangers of the Liturgical Revival.” The first danger is Rubricism: the tendency to attribute to the liturgy an importance which it does not possess; second, Activism, which insits upon practical ends; the third, Dilettantism, making changes in worship with an inadequate historical, theological, philological and musical knowledge. The fourth, liturgical Conservatism, in which „traditional“ equals „good“ and „new“ equals „irreligious“. ...“
