Vorlage:2021 Sekundärbibliographie Philosophie: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
Zeile 33: Zeile 33:
* [2021-000] [[Klaus Rohmann]]: Selbstwerdung in Würde: Philosophisch-theologisches Nachdenken über das Menschsein heute, 2021 [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=ar74EAAAQBAJ; zu Romano Guardini S. 18, 34 f. und 37-40
* [2021-000] [[Klaus Rohmann]]: Selbstwerdung in Würde: Philosophisch-theologisches Nachdenken über das Menschsein heute, 2021 [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=ar74EAAAQBAJ; zu Romano Guardini S. 18, 34 f. und 37-40
* [2021-000] [Englisch] [[Tracey Rowland]]: Beyond Kant and Nietzsche. The Munich Defence of Christan Humanism, 2021, darin zu Guardini "Chapter 5" S. 117-142 [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=BJsyEAAAQBAJ
* [2021-000] [Englisch] [[Tracey Rowland]]: Beyond Kant and Nietzsche. The Munich Defence of Christan Humanism, 2021, darin zu Guardini "Chapter 5" S. 117-142 [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=BJsyEAAAQBAJ
* [2021-000] [Englisch] [[Paolo Santori]]: Thomas Aquinas and the Civil Economy Tradition: The Mediterranean Spirit of Capitalism, 2021 [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=z6kjEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT113
** S. 103: „To understand this point, it might be good to recall the concept of polar opposition theorized by Romano Guardini. Refuting the Hegelian Dialectic, which envisaged reality structured by the dialectic between thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, Guardini believed that reality was the product of an unresolved and constant tension between two opposite poles: `The peculiar relationship in which two moments exclude each other and yet connect with each other, this relationship that appears in every quantitative, qualitative and formative determination, I call opposition´ (Guardini 1997, 29). Then, Guardini clarified that the opposition „is not a “synthesis” of two moments in a third. And not even a whole in which the two represent the “parts”. Even less mixing in view of some compromise. On the contrary, it is a question of an original relationship, in all and for all particular, of an original phenomeon. The one of the opposites can neither be made to descend nor to ascend from the other.“ (Guardini 1997, 41)“
* [2021-000] [Englisch] [[Paul Scherz]]: The Challenge of Technology to Moral Theology, in: [[Journal of Moral Theology]], 10, 2021, 2, S. 239-268, zu Romano Guardini S. 242 [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=jQs8EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA242
* [2021-000] [Englisch] [[Paul Scherz]]: The Challenge of Technology to Moral Theology, in: [[Journal of Moral Theology]], 10, 2021, 2, S. 239-268, zu Romano Guardini S. 242 [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=jQs8EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA242
* [2021-000] [Englisch] Stahlman, Robinson, Berkman, and Pugen: Making Sense of a World in Transition, in: [[Church Life Journal]], 2021, 11. Januar [Artikel] - https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/making-sense-of-a-world-in-transition/
* [2021-000] [Englisch] Stahlman, Robinson, Berkman, and Pugen: Making Sense of a World in Transition, in: [[Church Life Journal]], 2021, 11. Januar [Artikel] - https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/making-sense-of-a-world-in-transition/

Version vom 25. Juni 2025, 10:19 Uhr

Zu: Der Tod des Sokrates (1943)

  • [2021-126] [Kroatisch] Bruno Matos/Davor Šimunec: Guardini, Platon i blizina smrti. Iskustvo konačnosti u Guardinijevoj interpretaciji dijaloga u Sokratovoj smrti (Guardini, Plato and Nearness of Dying. The Experience of Finality in Guardini’s Interpretation of Dialogues in the Death of Socrates), in: Bogoslovska smotra, 91, 2021, 5, S. 1059-1078 [Artikel] - https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/397013
    • Englische Zusammenfassung: The authors of the article have tried to present the experience of the closeness of death in Guardini’s interpretation of Plato’s dialogues between Socrates and his devoted disciples who could not accept the decision of their master and friend. Guardini’s interpretations were written as a philosophical analysis of the state of Socrates' mind, it is not a psychological analysis of his emotions or emotional states. Guardini wishes to reveal how Socrates faces the mystery of death as a philosopher. The authors focused on the dialogues between Socrates and his disciples and how Plato as his disciple and chronicler describes his conflict with oneself and and the mentality of his followers on the mythological, political and philosophical meaning of death. ...“


Bearbeiten